Rated 1 out of 5áby SWISSFRANK PREMIUM denim???
As far as I'm concerned there's nothing about this denim that even somewhat suggests "premium" quality. In fact, you responded to another review saying this fabric was not quite as heavy as the other jeans in your line-up. (Not QUITE? Not NEARLY!!!) Maybe you find no correlation between the weight of a fabric and its quality, but I do. I'm always willing to pay for premium quality, but strongly challenge your using such terminology in the advertising of these jeans. Let the buyer beware!!!
March 14, 2015
Rated 3 out of 5áby Brettd Front Pockets are very small
Jeans look great and are made of very nice fabric but... I can't get my hands in the pockets.
I bought these to have a pair of more dressy jeans and I have loved all my past LLB jeans unfortunately these won't work. I'm a big guy and my mitts don't even come close to fitting. No retrieving keys or cell phones without a pair of tongs ;)
Back to the Double L's
February 28, 2015
Rated 3 out of 5áby GrampJ too short
great fit, love the olive gray, but 1" shorter than other Bean jeans. at 34" length there are not other order options. will have to return them.
February 20, 2015
Rated 5 out of 5áby Carlio Full-cut fit
What makes these jeans great is what they're not.
They're not made in a low-rise, slim-fit, crotch-crowding mall store style. They have a slightly longer rise, which is great for taller or longer-waisted men. They have wider-cut legs that allow for freedom of movement when hiking through the woods. And the leg openings are wide enough to easily fit over your boots, whether they're Bean boots, jump boots or cowboy boots.
I own two pairs of these in different colors, and they're definitely not hipster jeans. They're more of a classic sportsman's style, and they're made to last for years.
If you're shopping for something trendier, lower and slimmer, you might go for the Standard Fit or something from Bean's Signature line instead.
January 8, 2015
Rated 5 out of 5áby DanS Not just BLUE jeans
Jeans are very comfortable and wear well. I like that LL Bean has been offering them in various colors. I've purchased the bleached canvas, the grey and the british khaki. I hope they continue to offer alternative colors to blue.
December 25, 2014
Rated 1 out of 5áby RAMac Length not true
I own several pair of LL Bean Jeans and these arrived at least 1" to 1.5" longer than prior I have ordered/received. Could be these are "1912" and others were the normal but I should have read the reviews of recent (many others having same problem I did) so as to perhaps call them to get "true size". They are allowing free return and free reshipment of 2" shorter version and hope they...as I like the color and other overall fit.
November 12, 2014
Rated 1 out of 5áby COmailorderer Poor fit
These are enormous jeans - very big through the legs and they pulled up to my navel. From the pictures on the web site they didn't look like they'd fit this way. The fabric was a bit thinner than I expected, too. They're on their way back.
November 3, 2014
Rated 1 out of 5áby coltsfan12 not what was expected
The 1912 jean is no comparison to the Double L. It is lighter in material and the size I normally order is way to big. I cannot wear these jeans in public because they are too baggy. It is as if they sent the wrong size. Terrible. Very disappointed that this poor of product came from LL Bean. LLB is my favorite place to purchase clothes from.
November 1, 2014
Rated 1 out of 5áby LLBeamer Poorly made, not size claimed
Front pockets are several inches smaller in opening than last ones -- can hardly get my hand in let alone my cell phone. Legs are very baggy and almost flair out, The "29" inch inseam was actually 29 7/8. No where near the quality I've come to expect from L.L.Beam.
September 5, 2014
Rated 5 out of 5áby Rocky74 Comfortable, look good
Got my 1912 jeans in 2007 and love them. I want more when they are available in brown again. These were the only jeans I've ever found in a dark brown color.
September 4, 2014